Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 770 (MEG)

IAINEH NONGKHLAW v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/164/2024 · 2025-06-02

B Bhattacharjee

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No.21 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 164 of 2024 Date of Order: 02.06.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Shri. Iaineh Nongkhlaw Vs. 1.State of Meghalaya Represented S/o (L) B.S. Nongdhar, by the Secretary to the Government R/o Upper Lumparing of Meghalaya, District Council East Khasi Hills District Affairs Department, Shillong. Meghalaya-793004 2. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council Represented by the Secretary, Executive Committee, Shillong. 3. Executive Committee, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong. 4. Secretary (Legislative) Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong. 5. The Syiem of Mylliem, Mylliem Syiemship, Mawkhar Main Road, Shillong. 6. Shri Donbok Nongkhlaw Rngi, Son of Trial Nongkhalw Rngi, Resident of Mawnianglah, Upper Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 7. Shri Sainborlang Nongkhlaw Rngi, Son of Smti. Elinda Nongkhlaw Rngi, Resident of Mawkhan, Upper Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. ……Petitioner. …..Respondents. Coram: 2025:MLHC:464 Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. K. Paul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S. Chanda, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. J. N. Rynjah, GA. (R: - 1) Mr. T. T. Diengdoh, Sr.Adv.with Mr. J. K. Pariat, Adv. (R: 2-4) Mr. W. Jyrwa, Adv. R – 5. Mr. P. Nongbri, Adv. (R: - 6 & 7 ) ORAL:- Heard Mr. K. Paul, learned Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Chanda, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. J. N. Rynjah, learned Counsel for the respondent No.1, Mr. T.T. Diengdoh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. J. K. Pariat, learned Counsel for the respondents No.2 – 4, Mr. W. Jyrwa, learned Counsel for the respondent No.5 and Mr. P. Nongbri, learned Counsel for the respondents No.6 & 7. Challenge in this writ petition is against the order No. MS/V-19/Part- 1/2017-2024/798-802 dated 20th May, 2024 passed by the respondent No.5. It is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that the aforesaid order dated 20-05-2024 was passed by the respondent No.5 on the basis of the order dated 02-05-2024 vide letter No.DC.XXVII/Genl/173/2023-2024/36/289 of the Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, which has been set aside by this Court by order passed today in WP(C) No. 149 of 2024. He, therefore, submits that the order dated 20-05-2024 may also be set aside. The submission made by the learned Senior Counsel is not disputed by the learned Counsels appearing for the respondents. Since, the order dated 02-05-2024 vide letter No.DC.XXVII/Genl/173/2023-2024/36/289 of the Khasi Hills Autonomous 2025:MLHC:464 District Council has been set aside and quashed, the impugned order passed by the respondent No.5 vide order No. MS/V-19/Part-1/2017-2024/798-802 dated 20th May, 2024 also stands set aside and quashed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed. No Costs. Judge Meghalaya 02.06.2025 “Biswarup PS” 2025:MLHC:464 Digitally signed by BISWARUP BHATTACHARJEE Date: 2025.06.02 18:50:03 IST