Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76998 (BOM)

M/S. MERIDIAN HOMES THRU. PARTNER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/13237/2025 · 2025-11-14

Shri Ashwin D Bhobe, Shri Ravindra V Ghuge

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

922-WP-13237-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13237 OF 2025 M/s. Meridian Homes Through its Partner - Mr. Manoj Awasthi ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra And Ors. ...Respondents __________ Mr. Amey C. Sawant a/w Mr. Abubakar Patel, Ms. Eshwaree Kudalkar & Mr. Jeetenndra Sachddev i/b J S Legal, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Kakade, Addl.G.P. a/w Mrs. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for the State/Respondent. Mr. Ravindra S. Pachundkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Priyansh R. Jain a/w Ms. Shraddha N., Mr. Sagar Shetty, Mr. Akshay Naik & Mr. Shubham More, Advocates for Respondent No. 3. Ms. Kajal Gupta a/w Ms. Shweta Singh & Mr. S. D. Shetty i/b M. V. Kini & Co., Advocates for Respondent No. 4. __________ CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2025. P.C. : 1. Before opening the brief and before commencing the submissions, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition and move a representation to the appropriate authority. Such representation would be filed within 10 days. Gitalaxmi 922-WP-13237-2025.odt 2. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions. If the Petitioner prefers a representation, the same would be considered on its own merits. 3. We record that we have not expressed any view on the merits of the claim of the Petitioner. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] Gitalaxmi GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Digitally signed by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.11.19 12:54:00 +0530