SMT. SUMAN DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA529/2405/2025 · 2025-07-24
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76992 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76992 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:124246 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2405 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Suman Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Kumar Mishra,Raja Ram Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to direct the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghazipur to decide the Case No.265 of 2020 (Suman Devi Vs. Kamlesh Yadav) under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Bahariyabad, District Ghazipur pending before it, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicant no.1 is the aggrieved wife and applicant no.2 is the minor daughter of opposite party no.2. For the last five years, the maintenance case is pending before the court. The husband / opposite party no.2 appeared before the court but no effective proceedings are taking place and only dates are being fixed in the matter. It is further submitted that the applicant no.1 is a poor lady. She is not getting any interim maintenance. She is suffering mentally and financially both. Hence, a prayer has been made to issue direction to the court concerned for expeditious disposal of the case. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 5. These are the cases which require expeditious disposal because the sufferer is a lady almost in all the cases under section 125 Cr.P.C.
6. In the factual matrix of the case and keeping in view the hardship suffered by the applicant / aggrieved wife, the Court concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal
impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted in the matter by/to either of the parties. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc.
are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 ss Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad