Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-7363-2025 -1- 109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7363-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025 Islam ... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate, Mr. Mohd. Tarif, Advocate, Mr. Vikrant Koundal, Advocate for the petitioner. ******* HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)
1. Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of petitioner at the hands of respondents No.4 to 8, as he has performed marriage with respondent No.9 against their wishes.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner and respondent No.9 have married against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 8 and they claim themselves to be major and seek protection to their life and liberty. The petitioner apprehend danger from respondents No.4 to 8. He has placed on record marriage certificate (Annexure P-1) to substantiate his claim. VISHNU 2025.07.11 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CRWP-7363-2025 -2- The petitioner and respondent No.9 have jointly submitted a representation dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure P-4) to respondent No.2 but no action has been taken so far.
3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only.
4. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice for the official respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to learned State counsel during course of the day.
5. Without commenting on validity of the marriage allegedly performed by the petitioner and respondent No.9 with each other and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.2 to decide representation moved by the petitioner and respondent No.9 (Annexure P-4) within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioner and respondent No.9 from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them.
[ HARPREET SINGH BRAR ] 11.07.2025 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VISHNU 2025.07.11 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh