Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7698 (ALL)

SMT. PRIYANKA MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A483/58/2025 · 2025-04-28

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:66497 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 58 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Priyanka Mishra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Tripathi,Ashok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned trial court to decide Case No. 1285 of 2022 (Smt. Priyanka Mishra Vs. Rishal Kumar), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Baradari, District Bareilly, pending before the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No. 1, Bareilly, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is aggrieved wife. It is further submitted that earlier an exparte order was passed against the opposite party no. 2 and subsequently it was recalled but no effective proceeding is being taken by the trial court. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial court is directed to make all the endeavours to decide Case No. 1285 of 2022 (Smt. Priyanka Mishra Vs. Rishal Kumar), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Baradari, District Bareilly, pending before the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No. 1, Bareilly as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court/Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Rmk. Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad