Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP No. 12087-2025
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 12087-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.07.2026 Roshan Lal Sharma ....Petitioner versus Union of India and ors.
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Anita Balyan, Sr. Panel counsel for the respondents-Union of India. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral)
1. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for direction to the respondents to allow terminal posting as per the options given in Annexure P-3, as the petitioner is above 58 years of age and retiring on 31.08.2026, by setting aside order dated 12.03.2025 qua petitioner shown at Sr. No. 7.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents contends that the present petition has rendered infructuous, since order dated 12.03.2025, which is impugned in the present writ petition, has been cancelled, vide order dated 08.05.2026. She further contends that the petitioner has been promoted also w.e.f 01.01.2026, vide order dated 19.05.2026 and he has joined as well.
3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
4. Pending application (s) if any also stands disposed of. July 09, 2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Gaurav Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2026.07.14 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document