Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 215 FAO-5237-2015 (O&M)
Decided on:21.03.2025 Jarnail Singh . . . Appellant Versus Manjit Kaur and others . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL PRESENT: Mr. Aminder Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Vinod Chaudhri, Advocate for respondent No.6. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that inspite of the best efforts, he has not been able to get in touch with the appellant nor the appellant or his legal representative has approached the office of the counsel for the appellant and thus, he is not in a position to state as to whether any cause survives in the present appeal as on date and hence, he prays that the present appeal may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous but liberty may be granted to the appellant/legal representatives to revive the appeal, in case any cause of action survives.
2. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous with the aforesaid liberty.
3. Registry is directed to send the copy of the present order to the parties on the addresses mentioned in the memo of parties.
4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of with the abovesaid order.
(VIKAS BAHL) 21.03.2025
JUDGE Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No MEHAK HURIA 2025.03.21 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment