M/S 4-CREATIONS v. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER II
WP/21886/2024 · 2025-11-20
Jyoti M
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76961 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76961 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47902 WP No. 21886 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 21886 OF 2024 (L-PF) BETWEEN:
M/S. 4-CREATIONS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER BHASKAR VENKATESH, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 8TH PHASE, 2ND BLOCK, GOTTIGERE P.O., BENGALURU - 560083. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEMANTH R.RAO, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, YELAHANKA, NO.2, MARUTHI COMPLEX, 1ST 'A' MAIN, HIG 'A' SECTOR, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU - 560064. …RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47902 WP No. 21886 of 2024
ORAL ORDER When the case is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
The petition is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before the Court on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite giving sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and also for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3