Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7696 (UTT)

MONU GUPTA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1675/2025 · 2025-06-12

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/20 WPMS No.1675 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent no.1. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for respondent no.2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a tenant of a house, situated in Indira Vihar Colony, Sunehra Road Roorkee, Pargana and Tehsil Rooekee, District Haridwar. The landlord is the private respondent Neki Ram. The eviction proceedings were initiated against him, which were challenged by him in Civil Revision No.121 of 2024 (“the revision”), in which, the proceedings of execution case have been stayed, by this Court on 07.05.2025. But now, the landlord has got the electricity connection disconnected. The petitioner had applied for electricity connection, but the respondent no.2 is not giving him any connection. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that execution proceedings have already been stayed by this Court in the revision, but despite that the landlord has got the electricity connection disconnected; the petitioner has applied for its connection, but it is not being given to him. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 would submit that if the petitioner pays the entire dues and three times to the normal security, the connection would be provided to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is ready to pay the dues and securities, as proposed by the learned counsel for the respondent no.2. The Court takes on record the statement given by the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 as well as the statement given by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the statements given, the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner shall apply for electricity connection and deposit all the dues and security. Once it is done, the respondent no.2 shall proceed to grant electricity connection to the petitioner. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 12.06.2025 Sanjay SANJAY KANOJIA Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686df4d1afc6 0f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450A84B515 A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2025.06.12 18:35:15 +05'30'