Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7695 (AP)

Dunnutala Yella Reddy v. Sri.G.Srinivasulu.lAS,

CC/456/2025 · 2025-07-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010079322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 456/2025 Between: 1. DUNNUTALA YELLA REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 2. DUNNATULA NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O PENEHAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 3. PIDUGU RANGARI SIDDA REDDY, S/O SIDDAREDDYY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 4. GORRE LAKSHMMMA, W/O SIDDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 5. OSURU SUBBA RAYUDU, S/O SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 6. RAYANABOINA UTTAMMA, W/O KONADAYYA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 7. PADUM PULLAIAH, S/O GANGULAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. 8. DUNNATULA BORAMGARI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O YELLAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 9. PIDUGU SRINIVASULA REDDI, S/O SIDDARDHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. 10. PIDUGU GOVINDUKONADAL RAYUDU, S/O SIDDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 11. ADURI MUNEMMA, W/O VEERA BHADRAREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 2 YEARS. 12. SHAIK RAMAJA, W/O MASTANSAAB AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 13. VALLURU PEERAYYA, S/O GANGALACHERUVU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 14. DUNNATULA LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O YELLAREDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 15. DUNNATULA SAYAMMA, W/O PENCHALREDDY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. 16. AREM KONDAMMA, W/O PICHIREDDY AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 17. AREM BUJJI, W/O LAKSHMINARASAREDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. ALL ARE R/O MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE,ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI G SRINIVASULU LAS, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR, GALERU NAGARI SRUJALA SRAVANTI PROJECT, NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SRI A VENKATESU, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION,UNIT-LL,TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willful, wanton, disobedience of the orders of this Honble High Court dated 11.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.677 of 2024 by the Honble Lordships, and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, and pass 3 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit to implead the proposed Respondent as Respondent No.3 in Contempt Case C.C.No. 456 of 2025, and also pending miscellaneous petitions therein on the file of this Hon'ble High Court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. T S RAYALU The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 11.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.677 of 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents on counter submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in the contempt has been complied with however with certain delay and the same is neither willful nor wanton and tendered unconditional apology and prayed to close the contempt. 3. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that pursuant to filing of the Contempt, the respondent authorities had passed orders, as such, the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in the contempt have been complied with and prayed to close the contempt. 4. Recording the said submissions, as the authorities have complied with the orders dated 11.01.2024, there remains nothing for adjudication and this 4 Court, having satisfied with the reasons on the delay, is inclined to close the contempt. 5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 31st July, 2025 RKS