HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16773 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gufran Ahmad, holding brief of Shri D.S. Khan, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 and 5. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that the investigation in the instant case has already been concluded against respondent nos. 4 and 5. 3. Learned AGA has further informed this Court that in the instant case, a charge sheet has been submitted against the respondent no. 4, however, the respondent no. 5, Sheru alias Nasar Ahmad has been exonerated. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. In view thereof, since the investigation against the respondent nos. 4 and 5 has already been concluded, no cause of action now survives and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 6. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having been infructuous. September 22, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mrityunjay Pandey, Rakesh Kumar Mathur, Sanjay Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Amrit Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad