Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:120765 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10046 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghvendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:-
"i. To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the concern respondent no.3 to pay the retiral benefits and all consequential retiral benefits on the basis of post of the petitioner as officiating/ adhoc Principle on the last pay drawn salary of the petitioner. (ii) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3 to decide the representation dated 06-05- 2025 with specific and reasoned order moved by petitioner before respondent no.3. (Annexure No.9)"
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. The petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with
present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3, Deputy Director (Secondary Education), Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad