APHC010079222019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3493/2019 Between: 1. K SUREKHA, W/O. ALLACHERUVU NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 3/20, KUMMARI STREET, KALLURU VILLAGE, PRODDATUR MANDAL, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRODDATUR, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PRODDATUR RURAL P.S. PRODDATUR, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE SUB INSPECTORI, PRODDATUR RURAL P.S. PRODDATUR, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 6. ALLACHERUVU NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. MURTHAIAH RESIDENTS OF D.NO.1-29, VADDIMADUGU VILLAGE, KONAKANAMITLA, MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. ALLACHERUVU TIRUPATHAMMA, W/O. MURTHAIAH RESIDENTS OF D.NO.1-29, VADDIMADUGU VILLAGE, KONAKANAMITLA, MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. ALLACHERUVU MURTHAIAH, RESIDENTS OF D.NO.1-29, VADDIMADUGU VILLAGE, KONAKANAMITLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 9. ALLACHERUVU RAMANAIAH, S/O. MURTHAIAH RESIDENTS OF D.NO.1-29, VADDIMADUGU VILLAGE, KONAKANAMITLA, MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 10. YERUVA KUMARI, W/O. RAMANAIAH RESIDENTS OF KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 11. YERUVA RAMANAIAH, RESIDENTS OF KONDAMUDI VILLAGE, PONNUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3493 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 and 5 in not conducting the investigation and not filing the charge sheet in F.I.R No.250 of 2018 of Proddatur Rural P.S. Proddatur, YSR (Kadapa) District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the very provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and consequently direct the 4th and 5th respondent to conduct the investigation and file the charge sheet in F.I.R No.250 of 2018 of Proddatur Rural P.S. Proddatur, YSR (Kadapa) District and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Shaik Mohammed Ismail, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by the learned for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 22.08.2025 Pmk 4 20 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:3493 OF 2019 Date: 22.08.2025 Pmk