Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76939 (ALL)

RAJEEV RAJPOOT v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/24484/2025 · 2025-10-06

Neeraj Tiwari, Vivek Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 24484 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2- District Magistrate, Shahjahanpur, to decide the application dated 09.07.2025 which is pending before the respondent no. 2. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance petitioner has filed application dated 09.07.2025, but till date no decision is taken, hence a direction may be issued to the respondent no. 2- District Magistrate, Shahjahanpur, which is not objected by learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2-District Magistrate, Shahjahanpur, to decide the application dated 09.07.2025 of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent no. 2-District Magistrate, Shahjahanpur, to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. October 7, 2025/A.P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Rajeev Rajpoot .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad