- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49077 WP No. 16491 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 16491 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. 2. M. LAKSHMAMMA S/O LATE MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 3. MUNIRATHNA S/O LATE MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 4. SRI MUNIKRISHNA S/O LATE MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT ITCHANGUR VILLAGE, ATTIBELE-HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU - 560 099. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI NAGA REDDY V, ADV., - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. YELLAMMA W/O LATE RAMACHANDRA MAJOR. 2. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 3. RAMU S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49077 WP No. 16491 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 4. ANUSUYA S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. 5. PARVATHI D/O LATE RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 6. SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O MUNEPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 7. SMT. CHOWDAMMA W/O MUNEPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 8. SRI RAMESH W/O MUNEPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 9. SMT. MANJULA W/O MUNEPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING /AT ITCHANGUR VILLAGE ATTIBELE-HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU - 560 099. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 25.04.2024 PASSED ON I.A.NO. NIL BY THE PRL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU IN OS.NO.133/1984 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49077 WP No. 16491 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER 1. This Court on 17.11.2025 has passed a peremptory order granting a week's time to the petitioner to comply with office objections failing which petition shall be dismissed for non- prosecution. 2. The matter is called twice today. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Office objections are not yet complied. Therefore, in view of the order dated 17.11.2025, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8