SANJEEV KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/352/2025 · 2025-02-13
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7693 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7693 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20536 Court No. - 81 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 352 of 2025 Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Srivastava,Virendra Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Virendra Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant (Sanjeev Kumar and Kamla) apprehending their arrest in Case Crime No.143 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467 & 468 I.P.C., Police Station-Sirauli, District-Bareilly.
3. On the basis of instructions, learned A.G.A. has informed that in the aforesaid case crime, the applicants are praying for anticipatory bail but they are not accused in this case. Therefore, there is no apprehension of arrest of the applicants in the aforesaid case crime number.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants has stated that since the police has informed the applicants that they are accused in this case, therefore, the applicants have filed the present anticipatory bail application.
5. Having considered the submission of learned A.G.A. to the effect that the present applicants are not an accused in the said Case crime No. 143 of 2019 , therefore, there is no purpose to grant anticipatory bail to them.
6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Consigned to record. Order Date :- 13.2.2025/Ruhi H. (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad