Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76928 (PNJ)

SANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/36911/2025 · 2025-09-11

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-36911-2025 #1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-36911-2025 Date of Decision:-11.09.2025 Sandeep Singh. ......Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. S.S. Swaich, Advocate with Ms. Ishani Goyal, Advocate & Mr. Deepak K. Bishnoi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG Punjab. *** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The prayer in this petition under Section 482 BNSS is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.103 dated 09.07.2022 under Sections 323, 341, 506, 148, 149, 382 IPC registered at P.S. Sirhind, District Fatehgarh Sahib. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 24.07.2025 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State Counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of orders dated 24.07.2025 and is not required for custodial interrogation. In this view of the matter, interim order dated 24.07.2025 is made absolute. VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.09.12 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-36911-2025 #2 However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI ) JUDGE September 11, 2025 Vinay Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.09.12 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document