Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7692 (BOM)

Kisan Nana Ingle v. The State of Maharashtra Thr Collector Osmanabad and ors

CA/3117/2025 · 2025-03-18

Shri Rohit W Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

907 CA 3117 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3117 OF 2025 IN FAST/13655/2023 KISAN NANA INGLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. … Adv. Praveen Baliram Rakhunde, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent/S - State Adv. Kalpana Kulkarni (Sonpawale) h/f Adv. S. P. Sonpawale, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 … CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATED : 18th MARCH, 2025 PER COURT : 1. The non-applicant/Acquiring body has deposited 50% of the amount of compensation as awarded by the learned reference Court. This Court has granted stay to execution of the impugned judgment of the award on the condition to deposit the entire amount. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant/original land owner has moved the present application seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited along with accrued interest. He makes a statement at the bar that in similar appeals arising out of the same land acquisition case, land owners are permitted to withdraw the entire 50% amount 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:8625 907 CA 3117 2025 deposited by the non-applicant/Acquiring body on furnishing usual undertaking. 3. The learned advocate for the acquiring body does not dispute the statement made by learned advocate for the applicant/original land owner. 4. In that view of the matter, the applicant-land owner is permitted to withdraw the entire amount deposited, 50% of the amount deposited along with accrued interest on furnishing usual undertaking and 50% of the amount deposited along with accrued interest on furnishing solvent surety/security. [ROHIT W. JOSHI] JUDGE KS_Kamble/ 2/2