Sk. Ekbal @ Md. Munirul Haque @ Shekh Ekbal Khan @ Shekh Ekbal v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./69523/2025 · 2025-10-10
Satyavrat Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76912 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76912 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69523 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- GAUNAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sk. Ekbal @ Md. Munirul Haque @ Shekh Ekbal Khan @ Shekh Ekbal son of Late Jayaul Haque Resident of Village - Madhopur,Ps- Gaunaha, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Aditya Nath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Murli Dhar- A.P.P. Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 10-10-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in Gaunaha P. S. Case No.67 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 118(1) and 103(1) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case.
4. The Court considered the case of Sariyat Alam Khan @ Sariyat Alam @ Sariyat Khan in Cr. Misc. No.68174 of 2025 and after considering the case in detail and on merits rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sariyat Alam Khan
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69523 of 2025(2) dt.10-10-2025 2/2 in which the case of the petitioner also stands discussed. In this case also, process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has been issued.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the order dated 10.10.2025 in Cr. Misc. No.68174 of 2025, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. The prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected.
vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T