Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80132 Court No. - 84 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23043 of 2024 Applicant :- Arjun And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Om Prakash Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjay Kr. Srivastava Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned counsel for the informant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 4.12.2021; cognizance order dated 4.4.2022 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.1962 of 2022 (State Vs. Arjun & others) Case Crime No. 790 of 2021, U/s 323, 504, 506, 308, 336 of L.P.C., P.S. Kasia, District Kushi Nagar pending in the court of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasia, Kushi Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties lodged F.I.R. against each other and received injury. Thereafter, Investigating Officer submitted charge sheet and Court took cognizance and issued summons. Subsequently, the parties amicably settled the dispute and entered into compromise. Further submission is that it is a cross F.I.R. and parties entered into compromise and filed 482 Application No.28135 of 2024 before this Hon. Court and the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.05.2025 allowed the application and set aside the proceedings on the basis of compromise. 4. The co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.07.2024 directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification, thereafter, pursuant to the said order, parties appeared before the court below and in their presence, after due verification of the parties and contents of the compromise made between them, the court vide order dated 08.08.2024 has passed the verification report. A copy of the same is annexed with the bail application. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant and opposite party no.2 have settled their private and civil dispute through compromise and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicant. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 6. Learned A.G.A. and counsel for the opposite party no. 2 do not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of Case No.1962 of 2022 (State Vs. Arjun & others) Case Crime No. 790 of 2021, U/s 323, 504, 506, 308, 336 of L.P.C., P.S. Kasia, District Kushi Nagar, is hereby quashed. 9. This application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad