Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76898 (BOM)

SAJID KHAN RAZAULLAH KHAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND OTHERS

WP/4249/2023 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 1-wp4249-23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4249 OF 2023 (Sajid Khan Razaullah Khan Vs. State of Maharshtra and Ors.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Mohammad Ateeque, though V.C., Advocate for the Petitioner (s). Mr. A.V. Palshikar, AGP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 12, 2026. 1. By the Judgment dated 12 November 2025 passed in Writ Petition No. 2639 of 2024, this Court was seized of the issue as to whether the requirement of passing the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) is mandatory for teachers serving in minority institutions. While deciding the petition, this Court directed Petitioner No. 1 in Writ Petition No. 2639 of 2024 to furnish an undertaking before this Court within a period of two weeks. However, the said undertaking has not been furnished within the stipulated period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the undertaking shall be furnished before this Court during the course of the day. The statement is accepted. No further orders are necessary. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) MPBalekar