Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7688 (PAT)

Rubi Kumari v. Sandeep Kumar

MJC/2950/2025 · 2026-08-17

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2950 of 2025 ====================================================== Rubi Kumari W/o- Sandeep Kumar and D/o- Upendra Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Mathuriya, P.S.- Laheri, P.O.- Biharsharif, District Nalanda, Bihar, 803101. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus Sandeep Kumar Son of Manoj Prasad Varnwal, Resident of Charkapathar, P.S.- Charkapathar, District- Jamui. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 17-08-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): "for transfer of Divorce Case No. 111 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamui to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Biharsarif (Nalanda).” 3. The opposite party on the other hand submits that he has no objection to the relief sought for by the petitioner but he be allowed to appear through the video conferencing. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the opposite party appear through the video conferencing. 5. Having heard with the consent of both parties, Patna High Court MJC No.2950 of 2025(5) dt.17-08-2026 2/2 Divorce Case No. 111 of 2025 is hereby transferred from the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamui to the Court of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Biharsarif (Nalanda) with liberty to both parties to appear either physically or virtually through video conferencing. 6. In the event that the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Biharsarif (Nalanda) considers the physical presence of the parties necessary for the purpose of mediation, an appropriate order may be passed directing the parties to remain physically present on the particular date fixed for such mediation. 7. The MJC No. 2950 of 2025 stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U