SANJANA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/7444/2025 · 2025-07-14
Sumeet Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76875 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76875 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CRWP-7444-2025 (O&M) 112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7444-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2025 SANJANA AND ANOTHER .. Petitioners Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Vijay Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. ...
SUMEET GOEL
, J. (Oral)
1. By way of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty at the hands of respondent No.4
2. Notice of motion to respondents Nos.1 to 3 (i.e. official respondents).
3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
4. As per the petitioners, they have married on 08.07.2025 against the wishes of respondent No.4, who happen to be the family member/relative of the petitioners.
5. Both the petitioners have claimed themselves to be major relying upon their Aadhar Cards indicating that date of birth of petitioner No.1 is 23.08.2002 and petitioner No.2 is 30.01.1997. Jasmine Kaur 2025.07.14 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRWP-7444-2025 (O&M)
6. Without commenting on the legality and validity of the marriage as also the merits of contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 (Superintendent of Police, Kurukshetra) to look into the representations dated 08.07.2025 (Annexures P-5 and P-6) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass appropriate orders thereupon within two weeks from today.
7. Liberty is reserved in favour of private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause.
8. However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any other case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners.
9. The petition stands disposed off. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. 14.07.2025 (SUMEET GOEL) Jasmine Kaur JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes No Whether reportable Yes No Jasmine Kaur 2025.07.14 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document