AMIT SINGH ALIAS TUNTUN SINGH ALIAS TUNTUN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/519/2025 · 2025-07-30
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7687 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7687 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:20993-DB )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 519 of 2025
Amit Singh @ Tuntun Singh @ Tuntun, son of Binay Singh, resident of
village: Dumariya, PO: Kuba, Police Station: Hunterganj, District: Chatra. ... Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Respondent
--- CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
For the Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P.
--- 02/30.07.2025
IA No. 5191 of 2025
Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 32 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in this application, the delay of 32 days which had occurred in filing this appeal is condoned and this I.A. is allowed and disposed of. Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 519 of 2025
This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.12.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Chatra in Misc. Cr. Application No. 1651 of 2024 corresponding to Rajpur PS Case No. 98 of 2019, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that on an information a search was conducted and in a ditch IED bombs and explosives were recovered. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has been implicated merely on the basis of suspicion. It has been submitted that several co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 2022 of 2023, Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 524 of 2023 and BA No. 4339 of 2020. It has further been submitted that the appellant is in custody since 30.11.2023. Learned A.P.P. though has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant but does not dispute the aforesaid facts. Regard being had to the above, we while setting aside the order
dated 19.12.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Chatra in Misc. Cr. Application No. 1651 of 2024 corresponding to Rajpur PS Case No. 98 of 2019 direct the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs.
Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Chatra, in connection with Rajpur PS Case No. 98 of 2019, corresponding to G.R. No. 394 of 2024. This appeal is allowed. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
S.B.
(PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.)
-2-