1 2025:CGHC:8884-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 133 of 2025 M/s. Mahatma Gandhi Salt Mundy (A Sole Proprietorship Firm Having Gstn - 33 Abypc 5638 B1 Zq Sole Proprietor Mr. Arumugam Chakravarthy (Chakravarty A B) S/o Arumugam N (Uid) No. 5932 , 5384 , 0584 ) Aged About 47 Years 14 Marappa 3 Street Suramparti Nall Road Erode Tamil Nadu 638009 Also At Kh. No. 197/66 Samnapur Road Kawardha Chhattisgarh Through Their Leglly Appointed Attorney Mr. Sagar Surana S/o Mr. Dinesh Surana (Uid No. 5687 , 1167 , 4369) Aged About 39 Years House No. 143 Ward No. 6 Berala Bemetara (C.G.) ... Appellant(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary Department of Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection (New Secretariat ) Atal Nagar Nava Raipur Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Through Its Managing Director Block 7 A Ii Floor Sector 24 OfÏce Complex Head Quarter Atal Nagar Nava Raipur Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3. Tender Evaluation Committee For The System Tender No. 99564 Of Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Through Its Managing Director Block - 7a - 11 Floor Sector 24 OfÏce Complex Head Quarter Atal Nagar Nava Raipur Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) ...Respondent(s) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.02.20 17:38:51 +0530 2 For Appellant : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Government Advocate. For Respondents No. 2 & 3 : Mr. Anish Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Atul Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 20.02.2025 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal when the case is called out. 2. Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for respondent No. 1/State and Mr. Anish Tiwari, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Atul Kumar Kesharwani, learned counsel, appearing for respondents No. 2 and 3. 3. The present intra Court appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 29.11.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPC No. 3207 of 2022 (M/s Mahatma Gandhi Salt Mundy vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), whereby the learned Single Judge has partly allowed the writ petition filed by the appellant/writ petitioner herein. 4. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the appellant is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the appellant to 3 press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the matter. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan