- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51061 CRL.P No. 9947 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9947 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MR PRAPULLA BHAT ALIAS PRAPULLA SUBHASH CHANDRA BHAT AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OFF CKP HOLDING STOCK MAKING TRADING COMPANY, R/AT RAHEJA BEVVERIA B WING, NEAR MAHALAKSHMI STATION, BHANDRA MAHARASHTRA 400050. NOW O/A 406 MALAHPRAPULLA SUBHASHCHANDRA, BHAT BUR DUBAI BURJKHALIFA DUBAI 500001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANDESH CHOUTA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. MOULYAPOORNA R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE BY CUBBON PARK POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE HIGH COURT GOVT PLEADER, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. MRS VANDANA JAIN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, D/O SHANTHI LAL, R/O NO. 5, ANIL TULASI APARTMENT, Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51061 CRL.P No. 9947 of 2024 REST HOUSE, CRESENT ROAD, BENGALURU- 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAGADEESHA B.N, ADDL.SPP FOR R1; SRI. CHETHAN C, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KASHYAP N NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH BY INVOKING THE INHERENT POWERS VESTED WITH THIS HONBLE COURT U/S 482 OF CRPC, THE CHARGE SHEET IN CC NO.6970/201 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ACMM (NOW BEFORE 41ST ACMM), BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 420, 504, 506 OF IPC, VIDE ANNEXURE-A., AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ ORAL ORDER The proceedings in C.C.No.6970/2021 on the file of the Court of 8th ACMM, now pending before the 41st ACMM, Bengaluru are sought to be quashed in this petition. 2. Charge sheet is filed against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections – 406, 420, 504 and 506 of IPC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51061 CRL.P No. 9947 of 2024 3. A joint application seeking permission of the Court to compound the offence is filed under Section – 320 read with Section-482 of Cr.P.C. The application is accompanied with the consent terms entered between the parties namely, the petitioner and respondent No.2 / defacto complainant. Para-9 of the consent terms is extracted herein: “9. It is mutually agreed between the parties that the Party of the First Part shall further pay to the Party of the Secord Part a total sum of INR Rs.5,71,00,000/- (Rupees Five Crores Seventy One Lakh Only) (hereinafter referred to as the “Settlement Amount”) in consideration whereof all previous and outstanding dues, claims and liabilities, whether monetary or otherwise, stand fully discharged and repaid, and the party of the Second Part shall have no subsisting claim in respect thereof.” 4. The mode of payment has been stated at para – 11 of the consent terms. The application along with the consent terms are placed on record. 5. It is stated that the parties were engaged in certain business dealings and commercial engagements - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51061 CRL.P No. 9947 of 2024 with one another and in the course of such dealings, certain commercials disputes, differences arose. In view of the settlement, the second respondent / defacto complainant has agreed to extend full, unconditional and continuing cooperation in securing the quashing of the proceedings now pending against the petitioner. It is also stated that by virtue of the settlement, no grievance, dispute, claim or cause of action of any nature what so ever survives between them. 7. Having perused the charge-sheet material this Court is convinced that the dispute is purely private, which is commercial in nature and the offences are compoundable. In view of the settlement, the ends of the justice would be secured by permitting the parties to compound the offence to bring quietus to the entire dispute. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51061 CRL.P No. 9947 of 2024 8. Accordingly the following: ORDER i. Petition is allowed. ii. The entire proceedings in C.C.No.6970/2021 on the file of the Court of 8th ACMM, now pending before the 41st ACMM, Bengaluru for the offence under Sections – 406, 420, 504 and 506 of IPC are quashed. iii. Consequent to the quashing of the proceedings, the issuance of summons / warrant through Embassy, Look Out Circular as well as the Red Corner Notice issued against the petitioner, stands quashed. iv. Since the petition is allowed, all pending I.A.s stands dismissed. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2