JAGBIR SINGH SINDHU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/22332/2025 · 2025-08-04
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76865 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76865 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-22332-2025 (O&M).
-1-
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 120
CWP-22332-2025 (O&M).
Date of Decision: 04.08.2025.
JAGBIR SINGH SINDHU AND ANOTHER
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)
Prayer made in the present writ petition is for directing the respondents to treat the service rendered by petitioners with Fish Farming Development Agency (FFDA) as qualifying service for computing the pensionary benefits. 2
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the controversy in the present writ petition is covered by the ratio of the judgment passed by this Court in the matter of Deenu Khan Vs. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.25646-2014, decided on 13.12.2019. Learned counsel for RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.05 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-22332-2025 (O&M).
-2-
the petitioner(s) contends that the petitioner(s) would be satisfied, at this juncture, in case respondent-State is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners as espoused in the present writ petition as well as the aforesaid judgment passed by this Court by passing a reasoned and speaking
order in a time bound manner. 3
Notice of motion. 4
Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and she has no objection to the above request. 5
Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-Director, Department of Fisheries, Government of Haryana, Panchkula, Haryana, to decide the claim espoused by the petitioner(s) in the present writ petition by treating the same as a representation and to pass a speaking and reasoned order thereupon in accordance with law in terms of the facts pleaded herein as well as the aforesaid judgment passed by this Court within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and a copy of present petition along with accompanying Annexures.
August 04, 2025.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.05 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document