SHEIKH AMINA v. HILAL AHMAD PARRAY (DIR. URBAN LOCAL BOD
CPOWP/385/2014 · 2025-02-17
Javed Iqbal Wani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7686 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7686 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S.No. 22 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CPOWP 385/2014 in
[OWP 1670/2013]
SHEIKH AMINA
…Petitioner/ Appellant(s)
Through: None
V/s
HILAL AHMAD PARRAY (DIR. URBAN LOCAL BOD.) …Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy AG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE.
ORDER 17.02.2025
1. Record of the proceedings would reveal that statement of facts has been filed by respondent 4, however, on two previous dates, the arguing counsel for the petitioner did not chose to appear yet the proxy counsel for the petitioner sought time to lay a motion for substitution of new incumbents/respondents. Till date no such motion has been laid, so much so none appears for the petitioner today.
2. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the contempt notice issued is recalled and contempt proceedings are closed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the petition within four weeks time in case cause survives.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 17.02.2025
“S.Nuzhat”