Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43936 WP No. 18073 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 18073 OF 2024 (S-DE) BETWEEN:
SRI Y S ARUNKUMAR S/O LATE SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS LECTURER IN ENGLISH SARVODAYA PRE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE TUMKURU R/AT C/O SUBRAMANYA S V HULISANDRA VILLAGE BANASANDRA POST TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572212. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAYASHAM JAYASIMHA RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43936 WP No. 18073 of 2024
(PRIMARY AND SECONDARY) GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA MS BUILDING BANGALORE 560001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER / DIRECTOR PRE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE 560012. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO ACT UPON THE OBSERVATIONS MENTIONED IN PARA 12 OF THE ORDER OF THE R1 VIDE ORDER NO. ED 106 DGW 2018 DATED 25/04/2022 SHOWN AT ANNEXURE-B BY IMPOSING A TIME LIMIT. B) DIRECTION MORE PARTICULARLY A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE R2 TO TAKE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST THE OFFICIALS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PRE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION WHO WERE HANDLING TUMKUR SECTION AND WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOSS TO THE GOVERNMENT EXCHEQUER BY CAUSING DELAY OF 13 YEARS IN CONDUCTING ENQUIRY AS PER ORDER OF THE R1 VIDE ORDER NO. ED 106 DGW 2018 DATED 22/04/2022 SHOWN AT ANNEXURE-B BY IMPOSING A TIME LIMIT AND ETC.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43936 WP No. 18073 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner filed a memo for withdrawal. It is stated that primary relief that is being sought by the petitioner is seeking implementation of the observations made in paragraph No.12 of the order passed by respondent No.1 dated 25.04.2022. To pursue the said prayer effectively, it is necessary that the management of the college could be arrayed as one of the respondents and that necessary prayers be sought against them, in addition to the prayers sought in the present writ petition.
2. To seek such prayers against the management of the college, it is necessary that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition arraying the management as respondent and seek necessary prayers available in law against them.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43936 WP No. 18073 of 2024
3. Memo is taken on record.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS CT:KHV