- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28223 RPFC No. 29 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 29 OF 2020 BETWEEN: SRI. RAVIRAJU S/O SIDDACHARI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.1444, 6TH CROSS, UDDBUR GRAMA, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK-570 008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH PRASAD V., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. CHANDRAKALA W/O RAVIRAJU, D/O SANNASOMACHARI, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, 2. THRISHIKA D/O RAVIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 2 YEARS, MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER BOTH ARE R/AT NO.884, KOORGALLI, SHIVANAGAR, ILWALA HOBLI, MYSURU-570 027. …RESPONDENTS THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORD IN C.MIS.NO.319/2019 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT MYSURU AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 04.11.2019 PASSED IN C.MIS.NO.319/2019 BY ALLOWING THIS MAINTENANCE. Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28223 RPFC No. 29 of 2020 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The RPFC is of the year 2020. Till now, no steps are taken for issuance of notice to the respondents. 2. When the matter was listed on 18.7.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and no notice is served on the respondents, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TL/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8