HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28463 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced instruction dated 15.09.2025, which is taken on record. On the basis of instruction, he submitted that relief so prayed by the petitioner has already been granted. Therefore, petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. Under such facts of the case, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhakar Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gaurav Singh (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Avinash Chandra Pandey And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad