Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76824 (KAR)

SMT. SONNAMMA v. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAREDDY

WP/9484/2025 · 2025-10-25

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42416 WP No. 9484 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 9484 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SONNAMMA W/O LATE PEDDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 2. SRI VENKATAREDDY S/O LATE PEDDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 3. SRI P RAVI W/O LT PEDDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS PETITIONER NO.1 TO 3 R/AT VARATANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SRINIVASAPUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT 4. SMT.RAMALAKSHMAMMA, W/O REDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NADAMPALLI VILLAGE, CHINATAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR PIN-562104. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARASIMHA MURTHY G V.,ADVOCATE- ABSENT) Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42416 WP No. 9484 of 2025 AND: SRI. RAMAKRISHNAREDDY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT VARATANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SRINIVASAPUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. … RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER THE ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DTD 20.12.24 PASSED BY THE 2ND ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KOLAR (ITINERATE AT SRINIVASAPUR) IN MA NO. 10/22 AT ANNX-DCALL FOR THE RECORDSGRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE ORDER DATED-20/12/2024 AT (ANNEXURE - D) AND FURTHER THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Order dated 15.09.2025 reads thus: "Ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non-prosecution." In the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuring days of the respective matters being given". - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42416 WP No. 9484 of 2025 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called out today. It appears, the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE HR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13