Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76823 (ALL)

PRADEEP KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/24126/2025 · 2025-07-24

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122676 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24126 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Muktesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 2 (Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, Mirzapur) to grant permission under section 101(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 to exchange 01 Biswa Bhumidhari land of the petitioner from Arazi No. 348 arena 0.2340 Hectare with 01 Biswa banjar land from Arazi No. 366 area 0.050 Hectare both are situated at Village Godsar, Sarpati, Tappa-96, Pargana Kantit, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur which is pending before him bearing Case No. 8790 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T202516530108790) (Pradeep Kumar Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and Another) II. .issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 2 (Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, Mirzapur) to decide the exchange proceeding bearing Case No. 8790 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T202516530108790) (Pradeep Kumar Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and Another) under section during 101(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 during pendency of the present writ petition, otherwise the petitioner shall suffer" 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that proceedings under Section 101 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending consideration before respondent no. 2 for exchange of land. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Case No. 8790 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T202516530108790) (Pradeep Kumar Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and another) , in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 25.7.2025//V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad