4. MTA-2-25.docx Amberkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISC. APPLICATION NO. 2 OF 2025 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1996 OF 2022 Renuka Satish Narwankar alias Rekha Satish Narwankar .. Applicant Versus Mangala Sarosh Bana .. Respondent In The Matter Between Kamlakar Dattopant Abhyankar .. Deceased Mangala Sarosh Bana .. Petitioner ....................  Mr. Prabhu Velar, Advocate for Applicant  Ms. Ankita Singhania a/w Mr. Aniket Mokashi, Advocates for Respondent ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 7, 2025 P. C. : 1. Heard Mr. Velar, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Singhania, learned Advocate for Respondent. 2. It is stated that parties have reconciled their dispute and have tendered Consent Terms dated 07.11.2025 which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Parties are present before me who have signed the Consent Terms and have identified themselves through their respective Advocates. For the purpose of reference and 1 of 9 4. MTA-2-25.docx convenience, first 7 pages upto the execution clause are scanned and reproduced below:- 2 of 9 4. MTA-2-25.docx 3 of 9 4. MTA-2-25.docx 4 of 9 4. MTA-2-25.docx 5 of 9 4. MTA-2-25.docx 6 of 9 4. MTA-2-25.docx 7 of 9 4. MTA-2-25.docx 8 of 9 4. MTA-2-25.docx 3. Rights and obligations stated in the Consent Terms are taken as undertaking given to this Court by the respective parties and parties shall abide by the same expressly as agreed. 4. Order is passed in terms of the Consent Terms. 5. Misc. Application is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 9 of 9 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date: 2025.11.07 19:30:55 +0530