VIKRANT TIWARI @ SONU v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER
CRLR/3576/2024 · 2025-10-06
Madan Pal Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76814 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76814 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3576 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.
1. Sri Ritesh Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist states that he does not wish to press the present criminal revision and, therefore, prays that the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the revisionist, the present criminal is dismissed as not pressed.
3. This order has passed in the presence of Sri Vipul Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA for the State October 7, 2025 Akbar Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ritesh Singh, Suresh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Radhey Shyam Shukla, Vipul Shukla (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Vikrant Tiwari @ Sonu .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKBAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKBAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad