Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76811 (ALL)

SEEMA CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/10057/2025 · 2025-07-21

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10057 of 2025 Petitioner :- Seema Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Sharma,Sudhir Kant Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, Ms. Akanksha Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no.4, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the operative portion i.e. serial no.14860 of impugned order dated 30.06.2025 passed by the respondent no.2 whereby the petitioner has been transferred in Primary School Bilari, Moradabad from the Primary School Phoolpur, Mithan, Block Chhajlet, Moradabad and a further prayer to direct the concerned authority in pursuance of the transfer order dated 30.06.2025 passed by respondent no.2 and not to interfere to discharge her duty to the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher in the Primary School Phoolpur Mithanpur, Block Chhajlet Moradabad in pursuance of the impugned transfer order passed by the respondent no.2 where she is remain posted in this regard the petitioner submitted a representation dated 08.07.2025 before the respondent no.4, i.e. District Basic Education Officer, Moradabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner on her request was transferred by order dated 30.06.2025 to Primary School Bilari Moradabad, however, due to some personal difficulty, she does not want to join at the transferred place, therefore, in this regard, the petitioner has approached before the respondent no.2, but nothing has been done. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 submits that in case petitioner moves fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2, i.e. Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board, Prayagraj within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad