SUDIP BIJOY DUTTA v. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR
WP/699/2022 · 2025-11-14
Shri S M Modak, Shri Suman Shyam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76803 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76803 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
26 WP 699-22-OS.DOC Priya Soparkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 699 OF 2022 Sudip Bijoy Dutta …Petitioner Versus The Reserve Bank of India and anr. …Respondents None for the Petitioner. Mr. Subir Kumar with Ms. Vaishnavi Pawar and Ms. Ashita Aggarwal i/by M/s SDS Advocates, for the Respondent No.2. CORAM:
SUMAN SHYAM & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATED:
14th NOVEMBER, 2025. PC:-
1. None for the Petitioner.
2. By the order dated 19th September, 2025, this matter was fixed today for obtaining instructions by both the sides’ counsel, if any live issue still survives in this Petition.
3. Mr. Subir Kumar, learned counsel present for the Respondent No.2 submits that during the pendency of the Writ Petition the Willful Defaulter Identification Committee (WDIC) has not only declared the Petitioner as defaulter but the same has also been confirmed by WDRC. Therefore, there is no live issue in this Writ Petition. 14th November, 2025. PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date: 2025.11.14 19:01:28 +0530
26 WP 699-22-OS.DOC
4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 as well as upon going through the prayer made in the Writ Petition, we are also convinced that there is no live issue warranting adjudication by this Court in this Writ Petition.
5. Writ Petition is accordingly closed, as infructuous.
(S. M. MODAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { 14th November, 2025.