SRI MARIYAPPA M v. TRANSYSTEMS LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD
WP/44967/2013 · 2025-10-09
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76792 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76792 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39869 WP No. 44967 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 44967 OF 2013 (L-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI MARIYAPPA M, S/O LATE D.M.MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/A, NO.265 B, ULLALLA UPANAGARA VILLAGE AND POST, BANGALORE - 560 056. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.SADANAND G.SHASTRI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
TRANSYSTEMS LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, TOYOTA TECHNO PARK, NO.20, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA, RAMANGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.S.N.MURTHY., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SOMASHEKAR., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39869 WP No. 44967 of 2013 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.S.N.Murthy., Senior counsel on behalf of Sri.Somashekar., for the respondent has appeared through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 21.07.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. As could be seen from the Writ papers, the petition is filed in 2013. Now we are in October 2025. The petition is pending from twelve years. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39869 WP No. 44967 of 2013 Because of dismissal of Writ Petition, pending interlocutory application if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38