[2025:RJ-JP:11311] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2526/2025 Kan Singh @ Kanu Banna S/o Shri Madan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Chichdoli, Tehsil And Police Station Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Presently Tenant House No. 121, Sunder Nagar, Chand Vihari Nagar, Khatipura, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Shekhawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG and Mr. S.S. Ola, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.538/2024 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2)(b), 318(4), 304(2), 308(2) and 308(3) of BNS, 2023. Investigating is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 318(4), 304, 308(2) and 308(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that parties have resolved their dispute amicably. He contends that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is [2025:RJ-JP:11311] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2526/2025] in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also looking to the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; parties have resolved their dispute amicably and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Kan Singh @ Kanu Banna S/o Shri Madan Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-479