HEERO SHAMLAL MADHYANI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
WP/7067/2025 · 2025-11-07
Shri S M Modak, Shri Suman Shyam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76787 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76787 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
43-WP-7067-2025.DOC Rekha Patil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7067 OF 2025 Heero Shamlal Madhyani …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. …Respondents None for the Petitioner. Ms. Kavita N. Salunke, Additional G. P. a/w Mr. S. H. Kankal, AGP, for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2-State. Mr. Sidheshwar N. Biradar, for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM:
SUMAN SHYAM & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATED:
7th NOVEMBER, 2025. PC:-
1. None has appeared for the Petitioners.
2. Mr. Sidheshwar Biradar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, submits that this Writ Petition has been filed being aggrieved by the rejection of the interim prayer made by the Petitioner. However, during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the main Appeal itself has been dismissed by the Divisional Joint Registrar against which order, the Petitioner has filed a Writ Petition before the Singh Judge. As such, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 7th November, 2025 REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2025.11.11 10:39:50 +0530
43-WP-7067-2025.DOC
3. Similar is the submission of Ms. Salunke, learned Addl. GP appearing for the State.
4. After going through the record of this case, we find ourselves in agreement with the submissions made by the Respondents’ Counsel. The Writ Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of as infructuous.
(S. M. MODAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { 7th November, 2025