RAJINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/18948/2025 · 2025-07-10
Aman Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76786 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 76786 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT O
144 Rajinder Kumar and others State of Punjab
CORAM: HON
Present :
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
statutory pay scale to the petitioners as per the rules, with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in others vs. State of Punjab and another allowed on dismissed on 10.12.2024. petition, a submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Rajinder Kumar and others
Versus f Punjab and Others
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Mr. Pardeep Singh Mirpur, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made is for directing the respondents to grant statutory pay scale to the petitioners as per the rules, with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in others vs. State of Punjab and another, CWP allowed on 13.09.2024 against which LPA dismissed on 10.12.2024. Regarding the claim raised in the present , a representation dated 07.02.2025, Annexure P which has yet not evoked any response. instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection.
F PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18948-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 10.07.2025
....Petitioners
...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Advocate,
Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. cting the respondents to grant statutory pay scale to the petitioners as per the rules, with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in Saurabh Sharma and , CWP-15896-2023, which was 13.09.2024 against which LPA-2977-2024 has also been Regarding the claim raised in the present representation dated 07.02.2025, Annexure P-8, has been which has yet not evoked any response. Learned counsel, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection.
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.10 19:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.
CWP-18948-2025
-2-
2.
In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 07.02.2025, taking note of the aforesaid judgment, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.
10.07.2025
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.10 19:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.