- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26352 CRL.P No. 54 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 54 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SMT LALITHAMMA W/O LATE SHANMUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SRI RAJU S/O LATE SHANMUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS WORKING AS FDA AT FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, D.C. OFFICE PREMISES, YADAGIR, YADAGIR DISTRICT-585 201. 3. SRI RAKESH S/O LATE SHANMUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 IS PERMANENTLY R/AT BEHIND NADA KACHERI, CHORANURU VILLAGE AND POST, SANDURU TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 128. 4. SMT ROOPA W/O SRI S SATHISH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26352 CRL.P No. 54 of 2023 5. SRI S SATHISH KUMAR S/O LATE SHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.4 AND 5 ARE R/AT DESHNURU VILLAGE AND POST, SHIRAGUPPA TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 121. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJANNA C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT REKHA T.M W/O RAJU C S, D/O LATE T R MURTHAPPA. AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT THANIGERE VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, PIN-577 213. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SANTHEBENNUR POLICE STATION, SANTHEBENNUR CIRCLE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS P.P., HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VENKAT SATYANARYAN.D, HCGP FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.73/2022 OF SANTHEBENNUR POLICE STATION, SANTHEBENNUR CIRCLE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT REGISTERED - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26352 CRL.P No. 54 of 2023 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498-A, 323, 114, 504, 506 R/W SEC.149 OF IPC AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF D.P. ACT 1961 NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (Jr.Dn.) AND J.M.F.C. COURT CHANNAGIRI DAVANAGERE DISTRICT AGAINST THIS PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. 2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session. 3. This matter is of the year 2023. 4. Vide order dated 04.07.2025, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if steps are not taken, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, steps are not taken. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26352 CRL.P No. 54 of 2023 7. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE KBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2