APHC010078832022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 396/2022 Between: 1. VAJRAGADDA CHIRANJEEVI,, S/O SIMHACHALAM HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 310, FLAT NO. 202, CHALAPATHI NAGAR, VISALAKSHI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. M/S SAVITRI FURNITURE'S PROPRIETARY BUSINESS, CONCERN REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR, VAJRAGADDA CHIRANJEEVI, S/O SIMHACHALAM SHOP ADDRESS D.NO. 9-1-50, NEW RESAPUVANIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. HITESH KUMAR JAIN, , S/o Bhanwarlal, Hindu, Aged 35 years, Occupation Business, R/o Flat No. 306, Sree sambhav towers, Opp Super Bazar, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe present Revision is filed against the order dt 5-01-2022 passed in I.A. NO. 246/2021 in O.S. No. 747/ 2021 on the file of the Rent Controller Cum-IV Additional Junior Civil judge, Visakhapatnam for the following among other IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS No. 747/2021 on the file of Rent Controller Cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the above revision and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent: 1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: The present revision is filed against the order dated 05.01.2022 in I.A.No.246 of 2021 in O.S.No.747 of 2021 on the file of the learned Rent Controller – cum – IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that, the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 11th July, 2025 cbn 348 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.396 of 2022 11th July, 2025 cbn