SHRI. PRAKASH S/O NARASIMHA HEGDE v. THE MULTI-PURPOSE PRIMARY RURAL
WP/106413/2023 · 2025-04-25
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7675 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7675 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6855 WP No. 106413 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 106413 OF 2023 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI PRAKASH S/O NARASIMHA HEGDE, (MEMBER, MANAGING COMMITTEE, MULTI-PURPOSE PRIMARY RURAL AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, BAKKAL), AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TOTADAMANE, PO: BAKKALA, TQ: SIRSI, UTTAR-KANNADA-581 336.
2.
SHRI NARASIMHA S/O VENKATRAMAN HEGDE, (MEMBER, MANAGING COMMITTEE, MULTI-PURPOSE PRIMARY RURAL AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, BAKKAL), AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: PO: BAKKALA, TQ: SIRSI, UTTAR-KANNADA-581 336.
… PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SOURABH HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE MULTI-PURPOSE PRIMARY RURAL AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., BAKKAL, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, PO: BAKKAL, TQ: SIRSI, (U.K.)-581 336.
2.
THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SAHAKARA ADALITA BHAVANA, JAKKERI HONDA, BELGAUM CITY, BELGAUM-590 001, (NEAR RAILWAY OVER BRIDGE).
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6855 WP No. 106413 of 2023
3.
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, 2ND FLOOR, SARASWATI SADAN, KONEKAR WADA, KARWAR-581 301.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R2-R3;
R1-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Sourabh Hegde., counsel for the petitioners has appeared through video conferencing. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6855 WP No. 106413 of 2023
The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 23