IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66916 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2024 Thana- THAWE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Said Ali Son of Nasim Akhatar R/o- Bedu Tola, P.S.- Thawe, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepankar Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 17-09-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 431, 353, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, 1984. 3. According to prosecution case, on 03.02.2024 around 11:10 AM, a police party reached Bedu Tola Tin Mohani NH-531 after receiving information about a roadblock caused by a dispute between two groups. They found people blocking Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66916 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/4 the road with burning tires and other items. When asked to clear the road, the crowd shouted slogans against the police and scuffled with them. They also stopped an ambulance going from PHC Thawe to Sadar Hospital, vandalized it, and assaulted the driver despite repeated requests to allow passage. The incident was recorded and an FIR was lodged against 18 named and 50 unknown accused persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It has next been submitted that the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R. while name of the petitioner has surfaced during the course of investigation and there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against this petitioner rather the allegations are general and omnibus in nature and similarly situated persons, namely Sanjar @ Sanjar Alam, Sahnoor @ Shahenoor Alam and Dhanu @ Amir Sohail @ Amir Suhail have been granted bail passed in Cr. Misc Nos. 40646 of 2024 dated 03.07.2024, 22600 of 2025 dated 11.04.2025 and 28830 of 2025 dated 02.05.2025 respectively. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts that the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66916 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/4 has clean antecedent and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide; ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66916 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 4/4 cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. sharun/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U T