IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. K.P.S. Dhil ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking a direction to respondents No.3 & 4 to implement the order dated No.2 to enable it to take physical pos 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the order under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, has been passed by the Dis Magistrate, Sonipat possession for want of police help. 3. Issue notice to respondents No.1 to 4 only at this stage. 4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Anant Kataria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. 5. Heard. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19493-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 15.07.2025 AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. K.P.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking a direction to respondents No.3 & 4 to implement the order dated 21.10.2024 (Annexure P No.2 to enable it to take physical possession of the secured assets. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the order under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, has been passed by the Dis Sonipat, but the petitioner has not been able to secure the physical possession for want of police help. Issue notice to respondents No.1 to 4 only at this stage. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Anant Kataria, Deputy Advocate neral, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. Heard. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 OF DECISION: 15.07.2025 … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA lon, Advocate for the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking a direction to respondents No.3 & 4 to (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent session of the secured assets. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the order under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, has been passed by the District , but the petitioner has not been able to secure the physical Issue notice to respondents No.1 to 4 only at this stage. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Anant Kataria, Deputy Advocate neral, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. ... Respondent(s) The petitioner is seeking a direction to respondents No.3 & 4 to 3) passed by respondent Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the order under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets trict , but the petitioner has not been able to secure the physical At the asking of the Court, Mr. Anant Kataria, Deputy Advocate SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.07.15 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-19493-2025 6. In view of the limited prayer, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.3 and 4 to implement order dated (Annexure P-3) to enable the petitioner to take physical possession of the property in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 7. It is clarified that we are not exp the matter. This order shall have no bearing on adjudication by the competent Court/Tribunal. 15.07.2025 SwarnjitS Whether sp Whether reportable 2025 In view of the limited prayer, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.3 and 4 to implement order dated 3) to enable the petitioner to take physical possession of the property in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is clarified that we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter. This order shall have no bearing on adjudication by the competent (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No -2- In view of the limited prayer, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.3 and 4 to implement order dated 21.10.2024 3) to enable the petitioner to take physical possession of the property in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. ressing any opinion on the merits of the matter. This order shall have no bearing on adjudication by the competent (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No In view of the limited prayer, the petition is disposed of with a 4 3) to enable the petitioner to take physical possession of the property in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of ressing any opinion on the merits of the matter. This order shall have no bearing on adjudication by the competent SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.07.15 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document