Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46101 WP No. 22793 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 22793 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI.S.B.NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE BASAPPA, AGED 72 YEARS, R/AT NEAR SRI.SHAKTHI BHAVAN, MARUTHI NAGAR, AARASIKERE, HASSAN DISTRICT: 573103
(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED) …PETITIONER (BY SRI.K.N.NITISH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.K.V.NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU: 560001
2.
THE DIRECTOR, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU: 560001
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46101 WP No. 22793 of 2024
3.
THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, ARASIKERE TOWN MUNICIPALITY, ARASIKERE, HASSAN - 573103
4.
ARASIKERE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY, ARASIKERE, HASSAN 573103
5.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN - 573201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.H.K.KENCHEGOWDA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1, 2 AND 5;
SRI.A.V.GANGADHARAPPA FOR RESPONDENT NO.4;
VIDYA SELVAMONY FOR RESPONDENT NO.3;
SRI.P.M.SIDDAMALLAPPA FOR PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO.6 ON I.A.NO.1/2025)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE-N DATED 03.01.2024, ANNEXURE-P DATED 03.01.2024 AND ANNEXURE-Q DATED 08.02.2024, IN TERMS OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-L DATED 27.01.2023 BEARING NO.NA.SA.AA(4)C.R/SAMANYA SABHE/04/2022.23, WITH IN A TIME FRAME.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46101 WP No. 22793 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the petition for sometime, filed a memo to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. In view of the disposal of the writ petition all pending applications stand disposed off.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7