Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76700 (KAR)

NANJEGOWDA v. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER

MSA/37/2024 · 2025-11-26

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48979 MSA No. 37 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: 1. NANJEGEGOWDA S/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 2. GANGADHARAPPA S/O LATE DODDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 3. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE DODDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT CHATHRANAHALLI VILLAGE, SALAGAME HOBLI HASSAN TALUK - 573 201 …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. SHARADAMBA A.R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER H.R.P. 2, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, 1ST FLOOR, HASSAN - 573 201 …RESPONDENT THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 27.03.2019 PASSED IN LAC (APPEAL) NO.248/2017 ON THE FILE OF 5TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48979 MSA No. 37 of 2024 AWARD DATED 30.08.2005 PASSED IN LAC.156/2003 ON THE FILE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN)., HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE FILED UNDER SEC 18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. No representation. 2. Order sheet dated 19.11.2025 reads as under: "The appeal is listed for compliance of office objections for 7th time. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to comply with all the office objections before next date of hearing. A week's time is granted to comply with the same. List finally as a last chance, on 26.11.2025. " 3. The matter is listed for eighth time for compliance of office objections. Still, the office objections have not been complied with. It appears that the appellants are interested in prosecuting the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48979 MSA No. 37 of 2024 4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16