Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 76695 (KAR)

SHRI SEETHARAM v. KEMAPURADA APPAIAH

RSA/1380/2020 · 2025-09-12

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36428 RSA No. 1380 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1380 OF 2020 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI SEETHARAM S/O. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS 2. SMT. MAMATHA W/O. SATHISH, AGED ABOUT YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT SINGENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TLAUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE - 562 106 …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. RADHIKA K. FOR SRI. T. THIMMEGOWDA, .,ADVOCATE) AND: KEMAPURADA APPAIAH D/O. DYAVAIAH, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS, I.E. RES NO. 1 AND 2 WHO WERE ALREADY ON RECORD BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36428 RSA No. 1380 of 2020 1. SHRI. NARAYANAPPA, S/O. KEMPAPURADA APPAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS 2. SHRI. KRISHNAPPA, S/O. APPAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS 3. SHRI. N RAMESH S/O. SRI. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS 4. SHRI. N MURTHY S/O. SRI. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS 5. SHRI. N MANJUNATH S/O. SRI. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT YEARS ALL ARE R/AT SINGENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TLAUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE 562106 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P. MAHESHA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4) THIS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.07.2020 PASSED IN RA.No.5032/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, ANEKAL,. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.07.2019 PASSED IN OS.No.1085/2006 (OLD OS No.714/2005) ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ANEKAL AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36428 RSA No. 1380 of 2020 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel Sri. N. Thimmegowda for the appellants is absent. Smt. Radhika K., learned counsel for Sri. N. Thimmegowda seeks time. Appeal came to be dismissed for non prosecution on 29.10.2024 which came to be restored by Order dated 30.08.2025 and the matter is posted for Admission today. Today also the counsel for the appellants is absent and proxy prays time. No justification in granting further time as the appeal is of the year 2020. Accordingly, appeal stand dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45 ct:sg