124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-19048-2025 Date of Decision: 12.08.2025 HARPREET SINGH ...PETITIONER Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present:- Mr. Gopal Singh Nehal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Sonak, Advocate General, Punjab. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) 1. Challenging the impugned order dated 02.04.2025 whereby the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor (Physics) was rejected, the instant writ petition has been filed. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the present petition has been rendered infructuous for the time being since the advertisement in question itself has been set aside by the Apex Court. He further prays that he may be granted liberty to file a fresh petition in case fresh cause of action arises. 3. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, with aforesaid liberty. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE 12.08.2025 Rahul Joshi Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAHUL JOSHI 2025.08.13 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD